Wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor psychiaters, artsen in opleiding tot psychiater en andere geïnteresseerden
  • EN
  • NL
Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie
  • Tijdschrift
  • Terug naar hoofdmenu
    New articles Current issue Previous issues Special issues Book reviews
    Auteursrichtlijnen Over het tijdschrift Redactie Abonnementen Colofon Adverteren
    Current issue
    Nummer 1 / 2023 Jaargang 65
    Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie
    1 / 2023

    Current issue
  • Accreditatie
  • Meetinstrumenten
  • Vacatures
Edit
  • EN
  • NL
  1. Home
  2. Artikelen
  3. Measuring changes during the treatment of ...
New research

Measuring changes during the treatment of eating disorders: a comparison of two types of questionnaires

A.E. Dingemans, E.F. van Furth

background In mental health care routine outcome monitoring (rom) has become an important part of everyday clinical practice in the Netherlands. It is important that the questionnaires involved are sensitive to therapeutic change. The Brief Symptom Inventory (bsi) is a generic instrument that is widely used and that seems to be responsive to therapeutic change. However, in relation to patients with an eating disorder, more valuable information might be obtained from a questionnaire that is better geared to the primary symptoms of the eating disorder.
aim To find out whether the bsi and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (ede-q), which is a questionnaire designed to measure eating disorder psychopathology, reveal different degrees of therapeutic change in patients with an eating disorder.
method The sample consisted of 1062 patients seeking treatment for an eating disorder (dsm-iv). We performed an analysis of variance (2 x 2 design) in order to detect any difference between the two instruments regarding their sensitivity to change at the two time points. Patients were divided into four categories: recovered, improved, unchanged or deteriorated. We used a chi-squares test to determine whether the two questionnaires differed with regard to the proportions they gave for improved and recovered patients.
results The analyses revealed that in this patient group the ede-q was more sensitive to change than the bsi. The percentage of patients in the categories ‘recovered’ and ‘improved’ was higher in the ede-q than in the bsi. The same practice emerged with regards to the various subtypes of eating disorders.
conclusion It does seem to matter what type of questionnaire is used to measure the course and outcome of treatment. When responsiveness to change is being measured, it is important to use an instrument that assesses the symptoms that are the primary focus of treatment. If the primary aim is to reduce eating disorder symptoms, then the best type of questionnaire to use is one that assesses eating disorder psychopathology.

Download PDF
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Mail WhatsApp
Published by the Stichting Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie on behalf of the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie and the Vlaamse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie.

Over TvP

Over het tijdschrift Redactie Auteursrichtlijnen Colofon
Abonnementen Abonnee worden Adverteren

Contact

Redactiebureau Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie
drs. S.L. (Lianne) van der Meer
p/a Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie
Postbus 20062
3502 LB Utrecht
Telefoon: 030 899 00 80
info@tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl

Copyright

Redactie en uitgever zijn niet aansprakelijk voor de inhoud van de onder auteursnaam opgenomen artikelen of van de advertenties. Niets uit dit tijdschrift mag openbaar worden gemaakt door middel van druk, microfilm of op welke wijze ook, zonder schriftelijke toestemming van de redactie.

© copyright 2023 Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie