Tvp19 11omslag kijk verder

Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 47 (2005) 10, 659 - 669

New research

Destigmatisation through deconcentration? A Dutch populationstudy of the stigmatisation of psychiatric patients

J.T.B. van 't Veer, H.F. Kraan, C.H.C. Drossaert, J.M. Modde

background   Hitherto, very few population studies have examined the possible influence of the de-concentration of the mental health services on the degree to which psychiatric patients are stigmatised. aim   To measure the degree to which the lay public stigmatises psychiatric patients and to examine the extent to which public stigmatisation is associated with the de-concentration of the mental health services.
method   We took a sample from the Dutch general population (n = 445; response 30%) and from people living near mental health facilities (n = 367; response 34%) and measured stigmatisation in terms of (1) the desire for social distance and (2) the attribution of several stereotypical characteristics.
results   The public kept its distance and remained basically reserved. The psychiatric patient is mainly stereotypical as being aggressive. In attributing stereotypical characteristics the public differentiates clearly between specific illnesses (schizophrenia, depression, drug addiction, dementia). We found no differences in the degree of stigmatisation attributed to the mentally ill by the general public and by the sample of people living close to mental health facilities. Results indicate that people with personal experience of psychiatry are less inclined to stigmatise.
conclusion   The geographical dispersal of mental health facilities does not lead to de- stigmatisation. The de-concentration policy needs to pay more attention to conditions which promote de-stigmatising contacts between patients and their social environment.

keywords deconcentration, mentally ill persons, social distance, stereotyping